Two readers, Tara Kenny and Martin Caraher, sent this one: Plant-based diets–impacts of consumption of little or no animal-source foods on human health. by Alice V. Stanton Front. Nutr., 17 September 2024. Volume 11 – 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1423925
The paper argues for the benefits of meat-based diets:
The protections provided by plant-based diets against NCDs [non-communicable diseases] appear to be more strongly associated with reduced intakes of calories and salt, and increased intakes of fruit, vegetables, nuts and whole grains, rather than with reduced intakes of ASFs [animal-source foods]. Any possible absolute adverse effects of red and processed meat consumption on NCDs are very small and uncertain…dietary guidelines should advise moderating excessive consumption, rather than substantially limiting or excluding ASFs from the human diet.
The author’s conflict-of-interest statement:
Alice Stanton was a part-time employee of Devenish Nutrition (2017–2023); and currently owns stock in Devenish Nutrition, an agri-technology company specializing in sustainable food solutions.
Comment
My readers point out that the author’s financial conflicts of interest are understated. Devinish Nutrition is, in fact, a family business. The company states it is “an innovator in animal nutrition by providing a wide range of products and services.” It was acquired this year by EASY BIO a South Korean animal nutrition company.
Both readers also point out that Alice Stanton has pro-meat ideological conflicts of interest, but these concern me much less. Everyone who does research has beliefs and hypotheses they want to test. But not everyone stands to benefit financially from the outcome of their research or opinion, which is why full disclosure is so necessary.
The post Industry-funded opinion of the week: Against the benefits of plant-based diets appeared first on Food Politics by Marion Nestle.
Read MoreFood Politics by Marion Nestle